Keywords
Urban Planning
Urban Forest
How to Cite
Abstract
Urban forestry is crucial for quality of life in cities, but most Brazilian municipalities lack uniform parameters for its management. Therefore, the National Urban Forestry Policy project proposes the creation and implementation of Municipal Urban Forestry Plans (PMAs) in cities with pre-defined characteristics, which could lead to greater productivity in environmental management. Given this context, this article aimed to compare and diagnose the PMAs of five Brazilian capitals, analyzing their characteristics and identifying gaps in terms of their goals and aims, to understand the guarantee of ecosystem services provision through urban forestry. Content analysis was used to condense the total information into a set of categories. It was observed that, although the importance of ecosystem services is recognized, the plans show limited practical application and a lack of correlation between urban form and ecosystem services. To face environmental and social challenges, it is essential to adopt clear goals, financial sources, and robust strategies — parameters that were found to be incipient in the analyzed documents. Considering these findings, restructuring PMAs is necessary to contribute to urban resilience and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, improving urban quality of life.
References
ACHARYA, R. P.; MARASENI, T.; COCKFIELD, G. Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation – an analysis of publications. Ecosystem Services, Amsterdã, v. 39, e100979, out. 2019. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100979
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1977. 225 p.
BARONA, C. O.; DEVISSCHER, T.; DOBBS, C.; AGUILAR, L. O.; BAPTISTA, M. D.; NAVARRO, N. M.; SILVA FILHO, D. F.; ESCOBEDO, F. J. Trends in Urban Forestry Research in Latin America & The Caribbean: a systematic literature review and synthesis. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, [s.l.], v. 47, e126544, jan. 2020. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126544
BRASIL. Projeto de Lei n. 43.09, de 06 de dezembro de 2021. Institui a Política Nacional de Arborização Urbana, cria o Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Arborização Urbana, e dá outras providências. Brasília-DF: Congresso Nacional, 2021.
COELHO, N. R.; GOMES, A. D, S.; CASSANO, C. R.; PRADO, R. B. Panorama das iniciativas de pagamento por serviços ambientais hídricos no Brasil. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Rio de Janeiro, v. 26, p. 409–15, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-415220190055
CZÚCZ, B.; HAINES-YOUNG, R.; KISS, M.; BERECZKI, K.; KERTÉSZ, M.; VÁRI, A.; POTSCHIN-YOUNG, M.; ARANY, I. Ecosystem service indicators along the cascade: how do assessment and mapping studies position their indicators? Ecological Indicators, Amsterdã, v. 118, e106729, nov. 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106729
DE KEIJZER, C.; BAUWELINCK, M.; DADVAND, P. Long-Term Exposure to Residential Greenspace and Healthy Ageing: A Systematic Review. Current Environmental Health Reports, Suíça, v. 7, p. 65–88, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00264-7
DOWTIN, A. L.; CREGG, B. C.; NOWAK, D. J.; LEVIA, D. F. Towards optimized runoff reduction by urban tree cover: a review of key physical tree traits, site conditions, and management strategies. Landscape And Urban Planning, Amsterdã, v. 239, e104849, nov. 2023. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104849
HAINES-YOUNG, R.; POTSCHIN, M. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. 2018. Disponível em: https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/lg23_cices_v5.1_final_revised_guidance_03-10-2017.pdf. Acesso em: 25 jul. 2024.
HANSEN, R.; FRANTZESKAKI, N.; MCPHEARSON, T.; RALL, E.; KABISCH, N.; KACZOROWSKA, A.; KAIN, J. H.; ARTMANN, M.; PAULEIT, S. The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities. Ecosystem Services, Amsterdã, v. 12, p. 228–46, 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.013
LAM, S. T.; CONWAY, T. M. Ecosystem services in urban land use planning policies: a case study of Ontario municipalities. Land Use Policy, Amsterdã, 77, p. 641–651, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.020
LIMA, D. R. L.; POLLI, S. A.; DE CARVALHO, H. A. Participação Popular e Tics no Plano Diretor Participativo de Curitiba. Revista Baru - Revista Brasileira de Assuntos Regionais e Urbanos, Goiânia, v. 7, n. 1, e8603, 2021. https://doi.org/10.18224/baru.v7i1.8603
LIMA, M. V. S. A.; SILVA, J. M. Ambiente ecologicamente equilibrado: notas sobre arborização urbana nas legislações ambientais. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, Recife, v. 17, n. 4, p. 3052–66, 25 jul. 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v17.4.p3052-3066
NORTON, R. K. Using content analysis to evaluate local master plans and zoning codes. Land Use Policy, Amsterdã, v. 25, n. 3, p. 432–54, jul. 2008. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.10.006
O’BRIEN, L. E.; URBANEK, R. E.; GREGORY, J. D. Ecological functions and human benefits of urban forests. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, Amsterdã, 75, e127707, 2022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127707
ORSINI, F.; PENNISI, G.; MICHELON, N.; MINELLI, A.; BAZZOCCHI, G.; SANYÉ-MENGUAL, E.; GIANQUINTO, G. Features and Functions of Multifunctional Urban Agriculture in the Global North: a review. Frontiers In Sustainable Food Systems, Lausana, v. 4, e4:562513., 16 nov. 2020. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.562513
PARANÁ. Ministério Público. Manual para elaboração do plano municipal de arborização. 2. ed. [Organização de Paula Broering Gomes Pinheiro]. Curitiba: Ministério Público, 2018. Disponível em: https://site.mppr.mp.br/sites/hotsites/arquivos_restritos/files/migrados/File/Manual_Arborizacao_Urbana_2_edicao.pdf. Acesso em: 31 out. 2024.
PINTO, L. V.; INÁCIO, M.; FERREIRA, C. S. S.; FERREIRA, A. D.; PEREIRA, P. Ecosystem services and well-being dimensions related to urban green spaces – a systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society, Amsterdã, v. 85, e104072, out. 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104072
SEDDON, N.; CHAUSSON, A.; BERRY, P.; GIRARDIN, C. A. J.; SMITH, A.; TURNER, B. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 375, n. 1794, e20190120, 27 jan. 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
SILVA, G. M. A.; BRUN, E. J.; BRUN, F. G. K.; CALLEGARO, R. M.; COSTA, C. D. P. Metanálise do conteúdo técnico de diferentes Planos Diretores de Arborização Urbana do Brasil. Revista de Extensão e Estudos Rurais, Viçosa, v. 8, n. 2, p. 62–83, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.36363/rever82201962-83
THOMPSON, K.; SHERREN, K.; DUINKER, P. N. The use of ecosystem services concepts in Canadian municipal plans. Ecosystem Services, Amsterdã, 38, e100950, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100950
VELASCO-MUÑOZ, J. F.; AZNAR-SÁNCHEZ, J. A.; SCHOENEMANN, M.; LÓPEZ-FELICES, B. An Analysis of the Worldwide Research on the Socio-Cultural Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services. Sustainability, Amsterdã, v. 14, n. 4, e2089, 12 fev. 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14042089
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Marcos Vinícius da Silva Alves de Lima, Joelmir Marques da Silva